1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Fiat | Honda |
Model | Ritmo | CR-V |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2619 mm |