1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 610 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Ritmo | ATS |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |