1983 Fiat Uno vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1983 Fiat Uno is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (57 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 120 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (87 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Uno | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Uno | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |
