1983 Fiat Uno vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1983 Fiat Uno is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (71 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Uno weights approximately 110 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Fiat Uno | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Fiat | Lotus |
| Model | Uno | Elan |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 806 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |
