1983 Fiat Uno vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1983 Fiat Uno is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (71 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 286 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno. 1978 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 1983 Fiat Uno has manual transmission. 1983 Fiat Uno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Fiat Uno 1978 Mazda Cosmo
Make Fiat Mazda
Model Uno Cosmo
Year Released 1983 1978
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1242 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 71 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 100 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 56 mm 88 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 806 kg 1092 kg
Vehicle Length 3650 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 65 L