1983 Fiat Uno vs. 1979 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1983 Fiat Uno is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Mustang (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (44 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Mustang weights approximately 413 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (80 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Uno | 1979 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Uno | Mustang |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2560 mm |