1983 Fiat Uno vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Uno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Uno would be higher. At 1,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Uno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Uno weights approximately 56 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Uno | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Uno | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1301 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 1810 mm |