1983 Fiat Uno vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Uno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Uno would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (44 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 929 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (80 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Uno | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Uno | Falcon |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 533 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |