1983 Fiat Uno vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Uno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Uno would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (44 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 200 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Uno. (80 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Uno.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Uno | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Fiat | Suzuki |
Model | Uno | Equator |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |