1983 Fiat Vivace vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Vivace (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Ka weights approximately 98 kg more than 1983 Fiat Vivace.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Vivace | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Vivace | Ka |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2450 mm |