1983 Fiat Vivace vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Vivace. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Vivace.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Fiat Vivace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Vivace | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Vivace | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3010 mm |