1983 Ford Capri vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1983 Ford Capri is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 72 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Capri weights approximately 80 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1983 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Capri. (98 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Capri.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Capri | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Capri | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2360 mm |