1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1983 Ford Fairlane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 890 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Fairlane | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | 8 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2280 mm |
