1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 650 kg more than 1983 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Fairlane has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Fairlane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Fairlane | 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Fairlane | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 6749 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |
