1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 50 kg more than 1999 Acura CL.
Because 1983 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Fairlane | CL |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4092 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2715 mm |
