1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 326 kg more than 1983 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Fairlane | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Fairlane | Safari |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2830 mm |