1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (131 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 35 kg more than 1983 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Fairlane.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Ford Fairlane 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Fairlane XJR
Year Released 1983 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4092 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 131 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 304 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1630 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 5020 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2910 mm