1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 930 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1983 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2320 mm |