1983 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo V70 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (131 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 231 kg more than 2002 Volvo V70.
Because 2002 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo V70 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fairlane | V70 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2800 mm |