1983 Ford GT vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1983 Ford GT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford GT (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1983 Ford GT.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford GT (203 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1983 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford GT | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | GT | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2380 mm |