1983 Ford Laser vs. 1982 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Ford Laser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Ford Laser. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 300 kg more than 1983 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Laser. (121 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Laser | 1982 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Laser | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2620 mm |