1983 Ford Meteor vs. 2002 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Meteor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Meteor would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1983 Ford Meteor. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Meteor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1983 Ford Meteor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Meteor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Meteor | 2002 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Meteor | Armada |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4310 mm |
