1983 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1983 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Mustang weights approximately 183 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Mustang. (278 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Mustang | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Mustang | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |