1983 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Acura CL

To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 395 kg more than 1983 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: