1983 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 627 kg more than 1983 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Mustang (278 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1983 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Mustang | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | SSU |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
