1983 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Mustang (88 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Mustang weights approximately 265 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.

Compare all specifications: