1983 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Mustang | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Colorado |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 161 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |