1983 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1983 Ford Mustang. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Mustang.
Because 1983 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Mustang (161 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1983 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Mustang | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Cruze |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 161 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2685 mm |