1983 Ford Orion vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1983 Ford Orion is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Orion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Orion (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Orion should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Orion weights approximately 136 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Orion | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Orion | 8 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2280 mm |
