1983 Ford Orion vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1983 Ford Orion is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1983 Ford Orion. (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Orion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 264 kg more than 1983 Ford Orion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Orion | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Orion | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4738 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2190 mm |
