1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Ranger | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
