1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Holden FX
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1951 Holden FX | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | FX |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4380 mm |
