1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Saab 92. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1951 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Ranger | 92 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1951 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3960 mm |
