1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Simca 1000
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca 1000.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Simca 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1962 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Ranger | 1000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1962 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3930 mm |