1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Jaguar 420G
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar 420G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar 420G would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar 420G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Jaguar 420G (255 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Jaguar 420G should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Jaguar 420G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1966 Jaguar 420G | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ranger | 420G |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5140 mm |
