1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | Elan |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3700 mm |