1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
