1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4160 mm |
