1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (106 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Nissan Cedric has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Nissan Cedric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Cedric |
Year Released | 1983 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4700 mm |