1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Renault 20
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 20 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1976 Renault 20. (97 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault 20.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Renault 20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Renault 20 has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Renault 20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1976 Renault 20 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 20 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1645 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4530 mm |