1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ranger | Sable |
Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4790 mm |