1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (110 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Renault 19. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 19 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4170 mm |