1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4060 mm |
