1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1999 Toyota MR2. (127 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | MR2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3890 mm |