1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Honda City
To start off, 2000 Honda City is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Honda City. (94 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda City.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda City. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 2000 Honda City | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Ranger | City |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4230 mm |
