1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Honda Civic
To start off, 2002 Honda Civic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Honda Civic. (98 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Civic.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 2002 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Ranger | Civic |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4290 mm |
