1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | CR-V |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4540 mm |