1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2002 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 3274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4650 mm |