1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Tata Safari
To start off, 2002 Tata Safari is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Tata Safari. (136 HP @ 5530 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Tata Safari.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2002 Tata Safari | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Ranger | Safari |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5530 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4660 mm |