1983 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2003 Subaru Forester is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Forester. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Forester.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Ranger | 2003 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Ranger | Forester |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4460 mm |